Q&A: Why Can’t Leveraged ETFs be Bought and Held?

Dear ETFguide,

You and just about all the other ETF specialists are very adamant about using leveraged ETFs as short-term trades only.

Please comment about what I’ve done for a 5-year period of time that I’ve outlined below.

I’ve been investing in the ProShares 2X leveraged S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA:SSO). My calculations are from charts over the past 5 years. I use the 5 year period of time because I’m a long term investor and for longer than 5- years we have been in a very substantial positive market with but a few minor blips along the way.

According to my calculations (and using the S & P 500 ETFs) if you had invested in SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA:SPY) (1X unleveraged) and SSO (2X leverage) the following figures are true:  SPY was up 84% from 11/21/09 to 11/21/14. SSO was up 248.8% during the same time period…even nicer.

If at any time the SMA or EMA if you prefer (simple and exponential moving averages) for these ETFs fell below a certain predetermined level of your own choosing (such as 50DMA or 200DMA) and held for 3 closing days, you’d exit the position and wait for the trendline to rise above that moving average and make sure it held for 3 days before reinvesting.

This works so well that it’s scary and would almost guarantee a substantial profit over time. Do not expect great results unless you follow this technique for at least 3 years. Using the S&P 500 you have good diversification and there would be minimal trading in and out depending upon the moving average you use. Using 2X leverage gives you substantial upside potential in a bull market and going into cash or equivalents when there’s a downturn helps preserve capital and prevents catastrophic losses.

Do you see any problems with this method? I’ve been using it for a long time and have gotten exceptional results particularly in this strong bull market.

M.K. in Westborough, MA


Dear M.K.,

Using leveraged 2x (double) and 3x (triple) ETFs (NYSEARCA:SPXL) as buy-and-hold long-term investing vehicles isn’t how they were built to be used. However, that doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll have unsatisfactory results if you use them that way and you’re living proof.

We plotted a 5-year chart of SSO vs. the S&P 500 index (SNP:^GSPC). (See below) The first observation is that SSO is a 2x daily levered S&P 500 fund and it gained 245%. Shouldn’t it have gained 172% or double the S&P 500’s five-year 86% return? The answer is no and it’s mainly because SSO is built to deliver 2x daily exposure to the S&P 500, not 2x annual or 2x multi-year exposure. For that reason, SSO’s performance over a year or many years will often deviate from the straight up 2x annual or 2x multi-year performance return of the S&P 500.  Again, these performance discrepancies over longer periods are normal and should be expected.

SSO Chart

The proper place for leveraged ETFs – for you and whoever else decides to use them – is always in the non-core part of your investment portfolio. Are you using them that way? Have you already built the foundation of your portfolio with low cost exposure to the five major asset classes? If you haven’t, then you have no business owning leveraged anything. (Read our latest post on portfolio construction for more on core vs. non-core portfolios)

The trading system you’ve developed with SSO – so long as it stays above your SMA or EMA criteria – has worked like a charm during this particular market cycle. Congratulations! But like all trading systems, these tehniques aren’t necessarily error proof or without consequences. For example, you’ve absorbed considerable volatility – more than most people can probably tolerate.  Also, you’ve encountered an extremely favorable market climate for hyper-bullish trades where just about anything 2x or 3x leveraged long equities (except for gold miners)  has been a moonshot.

Bear markets are particularly good at dismantling trading strategies that were previously deemed as indestructible and your neat little system is no different. Eventually, the unfortunate day will arrive when your trading strategy won’t work and you’ll need to find a new system. Financial markets are dynamic (NYSEARCA:IVV) and constantly changing. And that’s why rigid methods that don’t recognize change by adapting often fail.

On a positive note, your trading strategy uses a strict buy/sell discipline. Isn’t that something more traders and investors should be doing?

Thanks for the question M.K.  and we hope continued success to you.

Tweet your ETF/investing questions to us @ ETFguide

Suggested Reads:

Posted in Fox Feed, Leveraged Long/Short ETFs, NASDAQ Feed, Partner Feeds, Portfolio Management, Yahoo Feed
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
4 comments on “Q&A: Why Can’t Leveraged ETFs be Bought and Held?
  1. I have to echo a few of the points that Herb raises, namely,
    1. the fact that the strategy has been successful for a particular five year period does not imply that it will continue to be successful
    2. if the strategy proves to be wildly successful and gains some notoriety, there is a strong likelihood that it will become a victim of its own success, i.e., the impact of others either using the strategy or recognizing its widespread has frequently led to changes in the market itself.

    Regarding your first point, a leveraged index ETF will thrive under two conditions:

    i. the underlying index continues to rise
    ii. the volatility of the index (on a daily basis in this case) is low.

    The S&P 500 has met both of these conditions over the past five years. Even if you didn’t withdraw funds during periods where the index dropped below a moving average for three days, you probably would have made out well.

    But if you were to apply this same approach to another index has demonstrated greater volatility, I suspect your results would not be impressive.

    The reason that so many pundits berate current leveraged index ETFs for a buy-and-hold approach is that volatility of the underlying index can not only erode profits, it can cause investors to lose money even when they correctly forecast the long-term trend.

    I have studied this phenomena at length and have gone so far as to develop an alternative structure for leveraged index products (including ETFs) that provide the benefits of leverage along with immunity to the value erosion caused by volatility. But, as of this writing, managers of leveraged ETFs have been so focused on their current client base who use leveraged ETFs for short-term purposes, that they have ignored the market for buy-and-hold investors.

  2. TR says:


    I’m sure your sitting in a nice position if you have continued with this strategy. I was wondering if you have an update as of 3 years after you wrote this letter. I started trying this myself a few months ago. As a college kid I have started with a smaller amount but started early. Just wanted to see how it works over an even longer time period. Thanks

    • GH says:


      Try using a 5/15 EMA crossover as a strategy to trade any stock or ETF. That should be a guide for buying and selling vs. buy and hold.

      • TR says:

        When the 5 EMA crosses the 15 EMA is that when you sell, and vise versa for buying?

        Thanks for you guys helping the younger students of the market. I hope to some day be able to beat the market not just by luck.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


One FREE Month of ETF Premium

Click the report icon to sign up and receive one FREE month of ETF Premium Membership.

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons

Get One FREE Month of ETF Premium

Simply provide your email address and we'll give you One FREE Month of ETF Premium!