Portfolio Report Card: Analyzing a Self-Managed $1.45 Million Investment Plan

What are the hallmarks of a well-built investment portfolio? Low cost, broad diversification, tax-efficiency, risk compatibility with the owner, and performance that matches or beats an apples-to-apples yardstick.

My latest Portfolio Report Card is for a married couple, C.J. in Orange County, CA. He is 57, she is 58 and they asked me to grade their combined $1.45 million investment portfolio. He works in the transportation business and she’s a fundraiser.

(Audio) Listen to Ron DeLegge @ The Index Investing Show

C.J. told me they manage their own money and consider themselves moderate risk takers with growth of money more important than current income. Altogether, C.J.’s owns 16 mutual funds and one individual stock (General Electric).

Their investment time horizon before retiring is 9 years.

C.J.’s combined $1.45 portfolio are scattered across different IRAs, 401(k) plans, rollovers from a previous job and a taxable account. Do they have a healthy or unhealthy investment plan?

Let’s do a Portfolio Report Card for C.J. and find out.

Cost
The combined fund expenses range from 0.09% (low end) to 0.82% (high end) and are controlled. C.J. has accomplished this cost-cutting mission by using low cost index funds covering large stocks (Nasdaq:VFIAX), midcaps (Nasdaq:VMGMX), and developed markets (Nasdaq:VTMGX).

Diversification
C.J.’s portfolio has exposure to foreign and US stocks, bonds (Nasdaq:PTTRX) and cash. Well done!

Still, it misses exposure to major areas or asset classes like emerging market stocks, commodities, and real estate. Remember: Broad diversification should always happen before investing in any individual securities like General Electric (NYSE:GE) and others.

Risk
The overall asset mix of this total combined portfolio is the following: 79.5% stocks, 12.5% bonds, and 8% cash. This is a high risk asset mix – even for late 50s “aggressive” investors. A 20% to 40% decline would subject this portfolio to potential losses from $230,000 to $460,000. C.J. privately acknowledged they need to dial down risk.

 Snapshot of C.J.’s Combined Portfolios

JC Portfolio

Tax Efficiency
All investment portfolios, whether taxable or tax-deferred accounts, should be built to minimize the negative impact of taxes to the greatest degree possible. The overall tax-efficiency is excellent. C.J. has executed 401(k) rollovers and hasn’t made any pre-mature retirement distributions or other activity that could subject them to unwanted taxes and penalties. Outstanding work!

Performance
This portfolio grew 9.9% from Feb. 2014 to Feb. 2015 versus a +10.95% gain for our blended index benchmark matching this same asset mix. Performance came close to matching our index benchmark and is satisfactory.

The Final Grade
C.J.’s final Portfolio Report Card is “B.” While not a perfect grade, it means this portfolio scored well in most grading categories.

C.J. scored best on cost, tax-efficiency and performance. However, diversification is sloppy and misses major asset classes like emerging market stocks (NYSEARCA:VWO), commodities (NYSEARCA:DBC), and real estate (NYSEARCA:VNQI).

The risk profile of this portfolio is hyper-aggressive and doesn’t match “aggressive” investors in their late 50s. I estimate a 20%-40% market decline would subject this portfolio to significant volatility and potential losses.

The good news is that C.J. are outstanding savers. And if they can tweak their investment plan, they’ll have a more robust portfolio with better balance and stability.

Ron DeLegge is the Founder and Chief Portfolio Strategist at ETFguide. He’s inventor of the Portfolio Report Card which helps people to identify the strengths and weaknesses of their investment account, IRA, and 401(k) plan.

Follow Ron’s new podcast Portfolio Talk on Twitter @PTalkRadio

Suggested Reads:

Posted in Asset Allocation, Fox Feed, NASDAQ Feed, Partner Feeds, Portfolio Management, Portfolio Report Card, Portfolio Talk, Yahoo Feed
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
3 comments on “Portfolio Report Card: Analyzing a Self-Managed $1.45 Million Investment Plan
  1. Safety Net says:

    Thanks for sharing the overview. That seems like a large cash position — well over 10% earning a zero percent return. How do you think about the right amount of cash to hold? Does it depend upon other opportunities, or interest rates?

    • Ronald Delegge says:

      I never tell anyone that X percent in cash is the right answer. Why? Because an appropriate cash position or “safety net” is only determined at the individual level and it’s a highly personal number. It’s also a number that will be impacted by multiple factors like age, risk tolerance, a person’s psychology, retirement date, investment objectives and time horizon along with liquidity needs.

    • Ronald Delegge says:

      FYI Safety Net, here’s video I did on why cash isn’t necessarily “trash.” I think you’ll like it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-8Sj7mYsug

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

One FREE Month of ETF Premium

Click the report icon to sign up and receive one FREE month of ETF Premium Membership.


Show Buttons
Hide Buttons

Get One FREE Month of ETF Premium

Simply provide your email address and we'll give you One FREE Month of ETF Premium!